Vai al contenuto
  • Benvenuto su ODONTOline.it - Forum per Odontoiatri

    Benvenuto su ODONTOline, Network dedicato all’Odontoiatria.
    Registrandoti ora avrai accesso a tutte le funzionalità della piattaforma. Potrai creare discussioni, rispondere, utilizzare il sistema di messaggistica privata, inviare messaggi di stato, configurare il tuo profilo... Se già sei un utente registrato, Entra - altrimenti Registrati oggi stesso!


Giacomo Tarquini

Risposte migliori

Giacomo Tarquini
STAFF

Aggiorno il caso clinico con un' immagine di follow - up che dimostra una sostanziale stabilità dei tessuti periimplantari duri e molli

 

1491691177_ATROFIEOSSEE_SMORRL.jpg.d47ae26c481592e2db2a09a988b99bd4.jpg

 

un saluto

Giacomo Tarquini

Link al commento
Condividi su altri siti

  • 4 anni dopo...
Giacomo Tarquini
STAFF

Immediate implants placed in infected and noninfected sites after atraumatic tooth extraction and placement with ultrasonic bone surgery

Cornelio Blus et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan.
Show details
 
www.dentaltown.com/messageboard/useruploads/images/100910/100910_26_19_23_19_19_22_3961.jpg'); background-position: right 1.3rem center; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 1rem;" target="_blank" >     Abstract        PubMed        PMID    
Full text linksCite

Abstract

Background: Only a few reports deal with implants placed in infected postextraction sites.

Purpose: Survival rates of a cohort of immediate implants cases placed in acute and chronically infected sites were compared with a cohort of noninfected ones while (1) tooth extraction and osteotomy sites were prepared with a piezosurgery device and (2) ultrasonication was applied to abate the bacterial charge at infected sites.

Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients received 168 immediate implants distributed into three groups: noninfected (85), acute (36), and chronically (47) infected sites. Atraumatic extraction and implant osteotomy were performed with an ultrasonic surgery device without flap elevation. All sites received the same medication and surgical protocol; infected sites were ultrasonicated during 30 seconds at 72 W. Kaplan-Meyer survival rates were calculated at 1 year.

Results: The 1-year survival rates of the noninfected, chronically, and acute infected groups were 98.8, 100, and 94.4%, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant. No implant was lost after loading. All teeth and roots could be extracted in one piece. Drilling at extraction sockets was uncomplicated, without skidding.

Conclusions: Implant survival rates might be similar in infected and noninfected sites when infected sites receive standard medical and surgical treatment and are ultrasonicated. Atraumatic tooth/root extraction and implant placement can be reliably performed with piezoelectric surgery.

  • Mi Piace 1
Link al commento
Condividi su altri siti

Mario Pagnanelli
STAFF

Molto confortante !!

Link al commento
Condividi su altri siti

  • 9 mesi dopo...
Giacomo Tarquini
STAFF
Link al commento
Condividi su altri siti

Crea un account o accedi per lasciare un commento

Devi essere registrato per lasciare un commento

Crea un account

Iscriviti per un nuovo account nella nostra comunità. È facile!

Registra un nuovo account

Accedi

Sei già registrato? Accedi qui.

Accedi Ora
  • Informazioni sulla vita del Forum

    07/30/02 17:10
    Data di nascita del Forum
    22 anni, 3 mesi, 22 giorni, 5 ore e 18 minuti
    Il Forum esiste da
×
  • Crea Nuovo...